ANResearch
01 QUARTER 02 COMPANY 03 SECTOR

Eternal Limited · quarter ended 30 June 2026

Revenue jumped 173%. Like for like, 66%.

Both figures are the company's own. The gap is an accounting change, not a boom. Customer spending the cleanest measure of size grew 54%. Here is the quarter in plain English, in about five minutes.

SOURCE  Shareholders' letter & unaudited results, Q1FY27  ·  reviewed by Deloitte Haskins & Sells
Customer spending ₹31,120 cr ▲ 54% YoY

What people actually paid across all apps.

Revenue booked ₹20,648 cr ▲ 173% · ▲ 66% real

Tripled mostly on paper. Like-for-like it grew 66%.

Operating profit ₹555 cr ▲ 223% YoY

All four businesses moved the right way.

Net profit ₹92 cr ▼ from ₹174 cr

Fell because of tax, not because of trading.

01 the quarter

Four businesses. All four got better.

Eternal owns Zomato (food delivery), Blinkit (10-minute grocery), District (dining & tickets) and Hyperpure (restaurant supplies). Every one grew and every one improved its margin.

Why revenue "tripled"Illustrative · one ₹100 packet, two ways of counting
Last year middleman
just a
commission

Someone else owned the biscuits. Blinkit took a commission for listing and delivering them, and only that commission counted as revenue.

This year owns the stock
₹100

Blinkit now buys the biscuits itself. So the whole ₹100 lands in revenue. Same customer, same profit much bigger revenue number.

Strip this out and growth was 66%. The same shift is why Hyperpure looks down 55% its goods now sit inside Blinkit's books. Underneath, Hyperpure grew 27%.

Blinkit is now the biggest business

35% 55% 10%
ZOMATO ₹10,769 CR BLINKIT ₹17,132 CR DISTRICT ₹3,218 CR

Two years ago food delivery was the whole story. Today groceries are the majority of what customers spend and the source of almost all the growth.

Zomato ₹10,769 cr spending · ▲ 20%
Profit₹606 cr
Margin5.6%
Users27.2 mn

The cash machine. Growing faster each quarter for a year, and funds everything else.

Blinkit ₹17,132 cr spending · ▲ 86%
Profit₹102 cr
Was−₹162 cr
Stores2,443

Profitable three quarters running while opening two stores a day.

District ₹3,218 cr spending · ▲ 60%
Loss−₹65 cr
Narrowing−2.7% → −2.0%
Screens5,000+

Still losing money, but growing twice as fast as management promised.

Hyperpure ₹1,034 cr revenue · ▲ 27% real
Profit₹6 cr
Was−₹18 cr
Margin0.6%

Small, but making money for the first time.

What customers spent, five quarters₹ crore
20,183 Q1FY26 23,164 Q2FY26 25,732 Q3FY26 26,880 Q4FY26 31,120 Q1FY27

Grocery (middle band) is doing all the heavy lifting. Total spending is up 54% in a year.

Group operating profit₹ cr
172Q1 224Q2 364Q3 429Q4 555Q1FY27

Up three times in a year and that is after absorbing ₹94 cr of losses on new bets (Bistro, Nugget), up from ₹64 cr last quarter.

Blinkit crosses into profit₹ cr
0 −162 Q1 −156 Q2 4 Q3 37 Q4 102 Q1FY27

From a ₹162 cr loss to a ₹102 cr profit in four quarters.

02 what changes for Eternal

It is turning into a warehouse company.

Eternal used to be an app that took a cut. It now owns stock, operates 19 million square feet of stores and warehouses, and spends more on building than it earns. That is the real story of the quarter.

Where the cash went₹ crore · this quarter
Profit from operations+555
Interest on the cash pile+311
Building stores & warehouses−711
Investment gains & tax refunds+331
Extra stock on shelves−170
Cash added this quarter+316

Building cost more than the entire operating profit. Cash still went up only because ₹18,288 cr sitting in the bank earns ₹311 cr a quarter in interest.

Is building stores worth it?Management's own maths, per ₹1 of sales
6.3p 3.3p the other 90.4 paise
BUILDING THE STORE 6.3p STOCK ON SHELVES 3.3p EVERYTHING ELSE 90.4p
MONEY TIED UP 9.6p · PROFIT EARNED 4.0p · RETURN 41.7%

Each store costs ₹2.5 crore to build and should sell ₹40 crore a year. That works out to about 9.6 paise of capital for every rupee of sales and 4 paise of profit. A 42% return would be excellent.

The catch: stores today sell ₹8.27 lakh a day, not the ₹11 lakh the maths assumes. Three-quarters of the way there. And stores now cost 2.5× what management guided a year ago.

Customers who stay spend nearly 3× more by year three.Blinkit cohort spending · quarter 12 = 279% of quarter 1

Customers deepen over timespend vs their first quarter
150%
Year 1
215%
Year 2
279%
Year 3

Nearly half of customers are still ordering three years later. Those who stay buy far more.

Why profit fell₹ crore
Profit before tax, last quarter228
Profit before tax, this quarter272 ▲
Tax paid a year ago63
Tax paid this quarter180 ▲
Net profit left over92

Old losses that sheltered Eternal from tax have run out. Trading actually improved the taxman just arrived.

What could go wrong

Tax demand₹447 crAuthorities want GST on old delivery charges. Eternal is fighting it and says it has a strong case.
Gig worker laws1 mn+Monthly active delivery partners across both apps. New welfare rules would add cost straight to the bottom line.
Spoilage1.8%Of sales lost to expiry and damage. Owning stock means owning the waste stock is up from ₹449 cr to ₹3,060 cr.
Heavy spending₹3,000 crSpent on stores in four years, and quarterly spending now beats operating profit. The cash pile is large but not endless.
All eggs, one basket55%Of customer spending is now grocery a business with only three profitable quarters behind it.

03 who else should care

Six industries just got a data point.

At this quarter's pace Blinkit alone annualises to roughly ₹68,500 crore a shop that did not exist five years ago. (Management called Q1 seasonally strong, so treat that as a pace, not a promise.)

Rival grocery apps

"Nobody can make money at this" is now false

Blinkit is profitable three quarters running while still opening 200 stores a quarter. Every competitor now has to explain its own losses.

−₹162 cr → +₹102 cr in a year
FMCG brands

A channel too big to ignore

31.8 million buyers a month, average basket ₹518, and premium "gourmet" stores coming to the big eight cities. Different pack sizes, different margins, one powerful buyer.

331 mn orders this quarter
Kirana & supermarkets

A dark store outsells a supermarket

Each store does ₹8.27 lakh a day about ₹30 crore a year from a plain warehouse with no shop floor and nobody walking in.

2,443 stores · 300+ cities
Distributors

The middleman layer is being removed

Blinkit now buys directly instead of earning a commission. Stock on the books went from ₹449 crore to ₹3,060 crore in a year.

Amounts owed to suppliers: ₹4,660 cr
New food delivery apps

Cheap menus get a cold answer

Management calls the new low-price entrants a discount story with no new idea. Zomato's own growth sped up for a fifth straight quarter anyway.

Zomato spending +20% · margin 5.6%
Cinemas & events

A second ticketing giant is forming

District covers 5,000+ screens and 7,500+ events, growing 60% a year with an app already on 27 million phones.

District spending ₹3,218 cr

The one-line takeaway

Eternal has proved an Indian internet company can grow fast and make money at the same time. But to get there it has become a retailer with warehouses, stock and leases not a light-touch app. The 42% return that justifies all the building is still a target, not a result.

Words you may not know

Spending / NOVWhat customers actually paid, after discounts. The cleanest size measure.
RevenueWhat the company is allowed to record as its own sales. Depends on who owns the goods.
Operating profitProfit from trading, before interest, tax and the cost of wear and tear.
Dark storeA small neighbourhood warehouse used only for delivery. No customers walk in.
Owning stock (1P)Buying goods and reselling them, instead of connecting a buyer to another seller for a fee.
Return on capitalProfit earned for every rupee tied up. The test of whether building stores pays.